About Me

Name: Always To The...
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Our New President: Disaster In The Making?

After many a disappointment with someone, and especially after a disaster, we may be able to look back at numerous clues that should have warned...

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Evidence-Based Reality

Video: Hawaiian official corroborates Obama COLB … again

People wonder why Obama doesn’t demand that Hawaii release the original records to put an end to the Birther nonsense. The biggest reason? It wouldn’t work. The same people who believe that Obama forged a Certificate of Live Birth twice corroborated by the state that issued it will insist that Obama got someone to forge any new records produced by Hawaii as well. It’s the same reason that having Palin produce her gynecological records won’t satisfy Andrew Sullivan and why producing the phone records from United 93 families to prove that they haven’t been in contact with the supposedly still-alive-but-hiding passengers on the 9/11 flight won’t change Truther minds. The conspiracy theorists have far too much invested in their argument to retreat.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It Gets Worse

CBO strikes back

The CBO released a new analysis of the House version of ObamaCare yesterday, after getting blasted by White House budget director Peter Orszag for “exaggerating” the costs associated with the proposal.  Douglas Elmendorf tells Rep. Dave Camp (R), the ranking member of the Ways and Means Committee, that the changes proposed by the White House will have little impact on their cost analysis, and that in fact the news gets worse in the second decade after the first runs up a $239 billion deficit

It’s not exactly rocket-science mathematics on display here.  If costs go up but premiums and health-insurance payments are capped, guess who pays for the rising costs?  The federal government.  The Obama administration will claim that they’ve capped costs and people will see their direct payments to health insurers and providers remain fixed, but the government will have to enact massive tax hikes to pay the back-end costs — which will come out of everyone’s pockets.  Either that, or the government will have to sharply ration care — which the Obama administration denies will happen.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Greater Inefficiencies, The Blame Game, Or Gatesgate?

Poll: What was the Obamateurism of the Week?

I’ve found that I get fewer inefficiencies in the OOTW system, although Barack Obama seems to like them in health care.  That probably won’t matter as much as the fact that Obama went through two years in Congress without realizing that his own party was in charge, although his entire tenure as a Senator amounted to a legislation-prevention program, and weren’t those the good ol’ days?  For that, you can expect to not see him blaming those rotten, no-good, meanie Republicans … right?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

News

Why Rahm Emanuel Demands a House Vote on Health Care Before Recess
He wants a vote before the details get out, and because he knows that Democrat members are going to catch hell from informed constituents over the summer.

Betsy McCaughey on Rahm Emanuel's Brother, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel:  Deadly Doctors
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Reform Puts Innovation At Risk

President Obama and congressional Democrats have spelled out few details in their health reform plan. But one thing is certain — it's going to be expensive. A new report from the Congressional Budget Office puts the price tag of the current proposal from Sen. Kennedy at more than $1 trillion over the next 10 years. An Associated Press report puts the Senate price tag at $1.6 trillion.

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care

What Does Health Insurance Insure? It's Not Your Health.

The American Thinker Health Care Is Not That Complicated

The problem begins with the almost universal misapplication of the terms. Health insurance does not insure your health, nor was it ever intended to.  Health care insurance, formerly called "medical insurance," is merely an instrument of neutralizing risk. Financial risk, that is.

It was brought about by a need to insure a family's assets against a dread disease requiring care so expensive it would wipe that family out financially.  As a strictly financial planning endeavor, the issue never seemed to be discussed in terms of being "a right" or in terms of "compassion."

Instead of being viewed as a financial instrument to keep a family from losing everything in an effort to pay for a cancer treatment or heart surgery, it has become viewed as an endless supply of other people's money to pay for everything related to healthcare --  so the family can buy every car, boat, flat screen, iPod and laptop they want with their own money.


 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Still Not An Option

Last week we said the reform plan moving through the House essentially outlaws the private individual medical insurance market. Critics said we were being dishonest. But we're standing by our story.

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

News Today

This is a Very Dangerous Time: Socialized Health Care is Not Dead
It's not over, and the left is never going to give up on it. But who's informing people? Not the mainstream, State-Run Media. It's us in the New Media!

Democrats Face Informed Citizens; Obama Doesn't Know What's in Bill
Obama says he won't sign the bill if it will take away your private insurance. Don't believe their promises or changes, folks. This bill outlines their goals.

"There's nothing major, structurally wrong with the health care system. Yet we bought the premise that we have to have major reform.  We don't.  So just put the breaks on all this."

Barney Frank Can't Find a Villain in the TARP Fiasco? Look in the Mirror!
And the same people who brought you the subprime crisis, want to give you subprime health care.

White House Comes Unhinged: It's All About Obama (and He's Lying)
"We're supposed to listen to what Obama says and not hear him.   We're supposed to see him and get the vibe and then trust him.   It is all about him.   He doesn't want us to read the bill."

Dastardly Obamacare Plan Seeks Government Control over Life and Death!
They'll decide when you've lived long enough, when you're worth treating and when you're not.
 
State-Run Media Struggles with President Obama's Slip in the Polls
Charlie Gibson says it's "gravity." No, it's that America is seeing he's a radical.

Obama says talking time over, but has no clue what’s in ObamaCare; Update: Obama admits bill needs more work






Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Wonder Why?

Obama hiding the budget numbers until August recess

Obama cannot afford to have another report hit the street showing that he has miscalculated — again — the extent of the deficit, just as he proposes a deficit-busting program.  The White House has instead iced the report to keep people from seeing just how badly Democratic spending has dented the budget, and how revenues have not recovered despite their predictions of growth by Q2.  They want to hold off those numbers until Obama has a bill he can sign on his desk, by which time it will be too late.

Consider this: if those budget numbers looked good, would the White House postpone revealing them?  Obama could use all the good news he can get at the moment, especially with two big-spending bills stalling in Congress.  If the deficit looked better than their May predictions, or even if it looked the same, those numbers would have already hit the front pages of newspapers across America and every network news broadcast, with the message that the worst has passed.

Obama delaying release of disastrous new budget numbers


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are We Going To Do The Same Thing To The Unwanted Old That We Do To Unwanted Babies?

How long until we start aborting the elderly, too?

Aborted babies are slaughtered by the tens of thousands, solely because they are inconvenient to young, busy people.

Old, ill parents are also going to become a major nuisance to the same generation, very soon indeed. Baby boomers are all secretly terrified that mum or dad will end up wasting away slowly in a care home, rapidly consuming the inheritance.

Could this be why the argument for legalising ‘assisted suicide’ is becoming so strident? We are offered lots of weepy hard cases, where terribly ill people are desperate to die and their relatives insist they should be able to help them without any risk of prosecution.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats Respond By Cooking The Books

CBO: House version of ObamaCare adds $239 billion to deficit

As if the White House hadn’t heard enough from Doug Elmendorf and the CBO this week.  Their new analysis shows that the House version of ObamaCare not only is not deficit neutral, but the actual hit to the federal deficit for this program alone exceeds $239 billion over the next decade.  Democrats immediately pledged to address it — by finding new ways to cook the books

Do these new rules cut expenditures by $245 billion over the next ten years?  No.  In fact, their new rules allow Medicare to pay doctors more for their services, increasing expenditures.  They just don’t have to show that on the books:

In the bill, Democrats provide $245 billion to eliminate an annual shortfall in payments to doctors under Medicare. Democrats resolved this annual headache, in large part, to win crucial support for the bill from the American Medical Association. That money currently counts against the overall costs of the bill, but Democrats have introduced legislation that would remove this obligation from federal deficit. However, CBO won’t recognize that change until those new pay-as-you-go rules become law.

Got that?  The Democrats want to spend the $245 billion but just not have it count in the checkbook.  I used to try these “accounting rules” with my first bank, although I did it accidentally.  They invited me to abide by their accounting rules or find another bank.  The money gets spent, but the Democrats don’t have to be held accountable for running the deficit any farther up than they’re already doing.  It’s a shell game, and nothing more.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reformers' Claims Just Don't Add Up

Many extravagant claims have been made on behalf of the various health care 'reforms' now emerging from Congress and the White House. But on closer inspection, virtually all prove to be false.

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »