About Me

Name: Always To The...
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Lies, Damned Lies, And Statistics

Video: The Mexican gun canard

We probably can discount any mathematical calculations made by the Barack Obama administration after we discovered that they overstated the TARP funds by a hundred billion dollars, but consider this just an extra data point. The Obama administration, including Hillary Clinton, have tried floating the notion that 90% of all firearms captured by Mexican officials in drug busts come from the US. Fox News reports exclusively that those statistics rely on a completely dishonest manipulation

What’s the actual number? It looks closer to 17%. Only a third of all weapons captured by Mexican officials actually get referred to the US for a trace. Of those, only about half can be traced at all, and 90% of those get confirmed as US sourced.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Judicial War On War

Federal court rules against the Geneva Convention

How ridiculous has the judicial intrusion on military action become?  A federal judge ruled today that terrorists captured on foreign battlefields and held by the military should have access to American courts.  Not only does that arrogantly assume American sovereignty over Afghanistan, but it also violates the Geneva Convention

This is, simply put, a war by the judiciary on American conduct of war.  The Constitution gives the judiciary no role whatsoever in the prosecution of war or in handling the prisoners our military captures.  War powers are explicitly split between the executive and legislative branches.  The practical reading of this order is that the federal courts have some sort of jurisdiction over military activity in Afghanistan, which proceeds from the equally fallacious rulings about Gitmo.

Not only does this violate the separation of powers in the Constitution, it actually violates the Geneva Convention.  Article 84 states clearly that prisoners of any stripe shall not get tried in civil courts

What does this order do?  It interferes with military operations by treating captured prisoners as having Constitutional guarantees intended for the maintenance of civil order.  Prisoners now will get the right to habeas corpus, turning soldiers into police officers and key intelligence into discovery material.  No one can fight a war with a Miranda warning in their back pocket, nor should they.

The net effect of this will be to push the military into killing its targets rather than capturing them, or to push renditions instead.  Congress needs to step in and stop this ridiculous overreach by the federal judiciary.

Buzz up



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This Is How The Government Doesn’t Run Automakers …

Government forcing GM, Chrysler out of NASCAR?

Earlier this week, Barack Obama said that he was sure that the federal government wouldn’t run GM, but two news stories make that statement look, well, expired
indeed.  NASCAR fans may find their options more limited, thanks to

a presidential intervention that will force both GM and Chrysler out of competition.  It’s too costly to have Government Motors involved in a sport that attracts millions of fans, you see

Let’s just say for the moment that this is on the level, as hard as that is to imagine.  It may not be a bad business move, for some of the reasons C&D mentions.  NASCAR costs a lot of money, and the tightly regulated environment doesn’t make for great R&D.  However, NASCAR is really a form of advertising, not research.  Does this mean that Obama will start approving and rejecting other forms of advertising?  Will TV ads be deemed too expensive?  No more Super Bowl spots for GM and Chrysler?

The Washington Post reports on a more substantial intervention at GM that portends a galloping shift towards corporatism

. . . the impetus for those moves should be from the company’s stockholders, not from the federal government — because the federal government should not have taken a stake in a private company in the first place.

How many CEOs will wind up on this board?  How many labor activists will take the place of the current board members?  I’d say less of the former and more of the latter.

Welcome to Government Motors.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »